David Wells: Response to the paper “What should be the context of an adequate specialist undergraduate education in mathematics?”, by Ronnie Brown and Tim Porter

Posted on 8 April 2012 by Alexandre Borovik

D. Wells, Response to the paper “What should be the context of an adequate specialist undergraduate education in mathematics?”, by Ronnie Brown and Tim Porter, The De Morgan Journal 2 no. 1 (2012), 85-98. The link to the paper by Brown and Porter.

Further comments are welcome — all posts on this blog are open to comments.

Material on this blog is written by contributors who are individually responsible for the content they provide. Posting of contributor-supplied content by blog administrators does not imply endorsement or approval. No failure to remove particular material constitutes an endorsement or acceptance of it by blog administrators.

All contributors to this blog write in their private capacity, and the views expressed do not necessarily represent position of the London Mathematical Society or any other organisation or institution.

Still, if you notice offensive spam or feel that a particular post or
comment crosses the boundaries of academic discourse, please write to Council Webmaster of the London Mathematical Society, Professor Stephen Huggett, s.huggett >>>at<<< plymouth.ac.uk.

M	T	W	T	F	S	S
						1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30

The De Morgan Forum

Daily Archives: 8 April 2012

David Wells: Response to the paper “What should be the context of an adequate specialist undergraduate education in mathematics?”, by Ronnie Brown and Tim Porter